The Left’s Fierce Opposition to the Waqf (Amendment) Bill
.jpeg)
New Delhi, April 4:
In a charged and marathon session of Parliament, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill was passed amid strong opposition, particularly from Left parties, who condemned the legislation as a direct assault on constitutional values and minority rights. CPI(M), CPI, and other members of the INDIA bloc raised their voices against what they described as “a politically motivated move” to further marginalize the Muslim community.
“Assault on Secularism” – Left’s Core Criticism
Speaking in the Rajya Sabha, CPI(M) MP John Brittas denounced the Bill as a “systematic violation of India’s secular democratic fabric.” He stated that the legislation “tears apart the constitutional guarantee of religious autonomy” and warned that such moves erode the trust of minorities in state institutions.
The Left emphasized that the Bill’s passage represents not a reform but a recalibration of state power to exert control over community-run institutions. The inclusion of provisions allowing non-Muslims on Waqf boards was strongly criticized, with Brittas calling it “a clear infringement on religious self-governance.”
Waqf Properties Under Threat
Left parties argued that the Bill dangerously weakens the traditional safeguards around Waqf properties — land and assets donated for charitable and religious use within the Muslim community. CPI leader Binoy Viswam said, “This is not just a question of property; it’s a question of dignity, of cultural autonomy, and of religious freedom.” The Left views the move as an attempt to open these properties to commercial or political exploitation.
“Dog Whistle Politics”
In their speeches, Left MPs connected the Bill with what they described as a broader pattern of communal targeting under the current regime. CPI(M) leaders termed the legislation an example of “dog whistle politics” — subtly fueling anti-Muslim sentiment under the guise of administrative reform. “When governance becomes a tool for polarization, democracy is in danger,” said CPI(M)’s V. Sivadasan.
Demand for Review and Reconsideration
The Left called for the Bill to be sent to a parliamentary select committee for deeper review, citing ambiguities and possible long-term damage to interfaith relations. However, the government rejected the motion, pushing the Bill through by a majority vote despite a 12-hour long debate filled with procedural drama and walkouts.
A United Opposition – But Divisions Remain
The Left’s stand was aligned with the INDIA bloc’s united opposition, but the vote also revealed cracks within some parties. The JD(U) witnessed internal dissent, with two leaders resigning in protest against their party’s support for the Bill — a development that CPI(M) described as “a warning sign of growing discomfort within the broader political spectrum.”
Conclusion: Resistance Beyond Parliament
While the Bill has cleared both Houses, the Left parties have signaled that the fight is far from over. Protests, legal challenges, and public campaigns are expected in the coming weeks. CPI(M) General Secretary Sitaram Yechury said in a statement: “We will continue to resist this communal agenda inside and outside Parliament. The struggle for a secular, inclusive India continues.”
By Sankar Pal
Special Correspondent,
