Vice President Dhankhar Criticizes Supreme Court for Overreach: A Threat to Democracy?
In a bold statement, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar has criticized the judiciary, claiming that some judges are acting as a "super Parliament." The remarks have ignited a nationwide debate on judicial independence and the separation of powers in India.
Judiciary Overreach: A Growing Concern
Dhankhar’s comments were directed at the Supreme Court's recent actions, particularly its directive to the President and Governors to expedite decisions on legislative matters. He expressed concern over courts stepping beyond their constitutional role, emphasizing that the judiciary's job is to interpret laws, not to make or execute them.
He also raised issues with the Supreme Court’s use of Article 142, which grants it special powers to deliver complete justice. Calling it a "nuclear missile" against democratic forces, Dhankhar argued that the judiciary's unchecked use of this provision threatens the democratic balance.
Impact on Separation of Powers
The Vice President stressed that democracy thrives on the clear separation of powers among the legislature, executive, and judiciary. By allegedly overstepping its bounds, Dhankhar warned, the judiciary risks undermining the democratic process.
His remarks have raised questions about whether the judiciary is encroaching on the executive and legislative domains, disrupting the balance of power.
Reactions from Legal Experts and Politicians
Legal scholars and opposition leaders have criticized Dhankhar's remarks, viewing them as an attack on judicial independence. They argue that the judiciary serves as a vital check on the other branches of government, ensuring accountability and safeguarding citizens' rights.
On the other hand, supporters of Dhankhar’s stance believe that judicial overreach can hinder governance and weaken the democratic framework.
Why This Debate Matters
The clash between the executive and judiciary is not new, but Dhankhar’s strong words have brought the issue to the forefront. At its core, the debate revolves around how to maintain a balance of power while respecting the judiciary's autonomy.
Conclusion
Vice President Dhankhar’s remarks highlight an important constitutional debate about the roles and responsibilities of different branches of government. As India continues to evolve as a democracy, finding common ground between judicial independence and accountability will be crucial.
This development raises critical questions about governance, making it a key topic to watch in the coming days.
